data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/856c8/856c803f9d7860708fd080a9c539afd840f4a327" alt=""
Anyway, getting back to PANDORA’S BOX, I must point out that it’s a lengthy novel, a door
stopper as some of you like to call it. At 864 pages (mass market paperback)
the novel has to be pretty darn good for
me to invest my time in it. It is, as it turns out. The story revolves around
two women who, born on the same date but different as night and day, come to
cross paths later in life against a backdrop of political agenda. What happens
before is a series of scandals and sins à la Elizabeth Gage. Lies, adultery, business
takeovers, all spiced up by a strong narrative and a psyche of its characters
that really lets you in on the reasons of their ways. In fact, if I had one
negative thing to say about PANDORA’S
BOX it’s that the author relies too much on explanation. The show, don’t tell mantra seems
completely forgotten at times, which, in the end, irks quite a bit, but since
the positive overcompensates the negative I am—and was—willing to let it go.
Indeed, getting into the nitty-gritty of this frothy read
that spans over thirty years was a joy still, most specifically because it took
over from the real world. With its fleshed-out characterization and
well-thought of plot twists (some expected some not) nothing came to matter
except the fate of these fictitious people. I even found myself getting soft on
the antagonist who the author managed to render human-like. Just go to show you
that even a trashy novel like PANDORA’S
BOX can impress on a literary level. But are we really surprised? This
second offering (after the riveting A GLIMPSE OF STOCKING) is nothing less than
what we’ve come to expect from a writer who, in my humble opinion, should come
back from the pseudonymous grave ASAP.
Until next post—Martin
![]() |
MMP UK edition |
No comments:
Post a Comment